Welcome to The EDU Ledger.com! We’ve moved from Diverse.
Welcome to The EDU Ledger! We’ve moved from Diverse: Issues In Higher Education.

Create a free The EDU Ledger account to continue reading. Already have an account? Enter your email to access the article.

Federal Judge Weighs Fate of Corbett Suit vs. NCAA

HARRISBURG, Pa. — Gov. Tom Corbett will learn within the next few weeks whether his federal lawsuit against the NCAA over the penalties handed down against Penn State will be allowed to continue, following a nearly two-hour hearing Monday in Harrisburg.

Corbett sued the NCAA in January, claiming the $60 million fine and other penalties levied against Penn State over its handling of the Jerry Sandusky child molestation scandal violated federal antitrust rules.

Scott Ballenger, representing the NCAA, said the actions it took against Penn State are not likely to harm the overall market for higher education or even the market for top-caliber football players, arguing antitrust law did not apply and that, if anything, the Penn State sanctions were imposed to improve the competitiveness of college sports.

He said the NCAA moved against Penn State to enforce rules about honesty, sportsmanship and conduct, rather than out of a conspiracy to help other schools at Penn State’s expense.

“These are rules about preserving the basic character and integrity of athletic competition and its relation to the goals, the most important goals, of higher education,” Ballenger said. The NCAA and its members, he said, have a right to determine how they want to maintain college sports’ tradition of amateur athletics.

Along with the fine, the consent agreement also imposed a four-year ban on postseason play, a temporary reduction in scholarships and the elimination of more than 100 wins under former coach Joe Paterno. The deal has angered many Penn State fans and alumni.

A weakened Penn State football program has implications for students, businesses and others, said Jim Schultz, Corbett’s general counsel.