SEATTLE
Kathleen Brose never understood why the Seattle School Board wanted to use race in assigning students to public high schools, especially when students from so many backgrounds already attended each.
The Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling rejecting Seattle’s assignment program and another in Louisville, Ky., vindicated those concerns, Brose said Thursday. The court held that although fixing the effects of past discrimination is a legitimate reason to consider race, Seattle’s schools were never segregated by law or subject to court-ordered desegregation. The majority also took issue with Seattle’s “crude” definition of diversity, in which students were classified only as white or nonwhite.
“I knew years ago we would go to the Supreme Court,” said Brose, president of Parents Involved in Community Schools. “I believed so much in what we are doing I just felt we had to win. The goal here is to make sure all kids have access to great schools.”
Brose, who is white, sued seven years ago, after her daughter failed to get into highly regarded Ballard High or her other two top choices because of her skin color. The girl wound up commuting across town to attend Ingraham High School in the city’s north end, then transferred when a new high school opened at Seattle Center.
In Seattle, incoming freshmen can choose which of the city’s 10 high schools they wish to attend. If too many students apply to one school, the district uses tiebreakers to decide who gets in. The first is whether the student already has a sibling at the school.
It’s the second tiebreaker race that was at issue, even though the district stopped using it in 2002 during litigation in the case. In schools that were considered “racially imbalanced,” preference was given to students who would bring the school closer to the district-wide ratio of whites to nonwhites, 40 percent to 60 percent. It helped whites get into predominantly minority schools, and vice versa.
