File photo
The Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges released "From Oversight to Impact: How Governing Boards and Administrators Advance Student Success", concluding a yearlong examination of institutions achieving strong outcomes for low-income, first-generation, and underrepresented students.
The report profiles California State University, San Bernardino; Hostos Community College of the City University of New York; Kean University in New Jersey; and Prairie View A&M University in Texas. Researchers selected the institutions based on their performance in access, retention, and student outcomes.
"Boards have an essential role in ensuring every student has the opportunity to succeed," said Ross A. Mugler, AGB interim president and CEO. "This report makes clear that student success isn't just an academic issue; it should also be a governance priority. Boards that take this seriously are helping their institutions stay mission-centered, equity-focused, and future-ready."
The study identified 10 common practices across the four institutions, with the most consistent being making student success the central organizing principle across governance, planning, and budgeting decisions. This approach represents a shift from treating student success as one priority among many to positioning it as the framework through which boards evaluate all institutional decisions.
Researchers conducted in-depth interviews with board members and senior administrators, reviewed institutional data and board materials, and analyzed system-level policies where applicable. The methodology allowed the research team to examine not just what boards were doing, but how their actions translated into measurable improvements for students.
The report demonstrates how intentional, strategic, and focused partnerships between governing boards and campus leadership can expand opportunities for all students. At each of the four institutions studied, board-level engagement in student success initiatives correlated with improved outcomes and institutional transformation.
The findings arrive as higher education faces intensifying scrutiny over college costs and degree value. With questions about return on investment dominating public discourse, the report suggests that governing boards can play a pivotal role in ensuring institutions remain focused on their core mission of student achievement.
The report urges boards to embrace ongoing fiduciary responsibility for inclusive excellence rather than limiting engagement to periodic reviews. By treating student success as a continuous governance priority rather than an episodic concern, boards can drive sustained institutional change.
To support implementation, the report includes practical tools such as checklists, policy questions, and a governance framework designed to guide continuous improvement in student success initiatives. These resources are intended to help boards at other institutions adopt similar approaches to advancing equity and student outcomes.
The four institutions examined in the study represent diverse institutional types and student populations, from a historically Black university to a Hispanic-serving community college, suggesting that the governance practices identified can be adapted across different higher education contexts.
