Welcome to The EDU Ledger.com! We’ve moved from Diverse.
Welcome to The EDU Ledger! We’ve moved from Diverse: Issues In Higher Education.

Create a free The EDU Ledger account to continue reading. Already have an account? Enter your email to access the article.

Georgia Tech GRIOT Leadership Series Highlights Black Male Achievement

The lack of Black males occupying leadership positions at institutions of higher education has been well documented. The reasons for this may vary, but there is no doubt that an increased level of mentorship, guidance and networking would widen the pathways of upward mobility in colleges and universities. Recently, a group of individuals at Georgia Tech have established the GRIOT Leadership Series to provide mentoring and guidance for employees to navigate the institution and move to higher positions.

The GRIOT Series highlights the achievements and success of African-American males in various leadership positions at the institution. The series was put in place to learn their thoughts on mentoring, engagement and networking as well as to explore different avenues toward success.

A recent session featured a very candid and powerful discussion by Chris Burke (director of community relations), Dr. Gary May (dean of the College of Engineering), Dr. Archie Erwin (vice president of institute diversity), S. Gordon Moore Jr. (executive director of student diversity and inclusion), Marvin Lewis (associate athletic director for finance and administration), and Ricky Rowe (senior educational facility planner).

The presence and performance of these individuals not only provided a platform for diversity and inclusion, but they were able to provide insight on how they have impacted the culture of the campus environment. The panel explored a number of different themes and topics relating to the plight of Black males in higher educational settings.

One topic was the lack of visibility in some circumstances and the need for the dissemination of success stories. This has the capacity to aid others as they navigate the often challenging journey of succeeding as underrepresented minority at a major university. Panelists also spoke about the importance of garnering the requisite credentials and expertise to be at a level where they could make a difference in policy making arenas.

The ascension of the panel members did not come without struggle and the assistance of mentors and advocates who provided key guidance and created opportunities for them. Still, elevation was accompanied in some circumstances by marginalization as individuals had to deal with negative stereotypes and perceptions.

This sometimes created a sense of self-consciousness about how they were being perceived. One panelist spoke about a reluctance to want to be viewed as “the angry Black man” but still needing to press on key issues of inclusion. There was an internal conflict that some felt between being their authentic selves in certain settings and “wearing the mask”.