Report: Few Prisoners Enrolling In Available College Classes
WASHINGTON
Despite mounting evidence that correctional education — and postsecondary education in particular — can be a cost-effective approach to reducing recidivism, fewer than 5 percent of prisoners nationwide are currently enrolled in college classes, according to a new report from the Institute for Higher Education Policy.
Recidivism — the re-arrest, reconviction or return to prison of former prisoners — has contributed to a rapidly growing prison population in the United States that costs American taxpayers nearly $30 billion annually.
To better understand the status, funding and implementation of postsecondary correctional education programs in the United States, the institute conducted a national survey that yielded input from correctional education administrators in 45 states and the Federal Bureau of Prisons. Results of the survey, along with additional data and analysis, are detailed in the new report, “Learning to Reduce Recidivism: A 50-State Analysis of Postsecondary Correctional Education Policy.”
In 2003-2004, approximately 85,000 prisoners — fewer than 5 percent of the total prison population — were taking college courses, according to the report.
Interestingly, the vast majority of incarcerated students taking part in higher education — 89 percent — were enrolled in programs in 15 prison systems that awarded 96 percent of all degrees and certificates granted to prisoners nationwide. But contrary to popular perceptions, prison inmates have not been receiving free college degrees, even at the associate level, in any significant numbers. Of those prisoners who earned a credential in 2003-2004, 92 percent were enrolled in vocational certificate programs for college credit.
“Prisoners are serving longer sentences than in the past but are frequently released without the education or skills necessary to find productive employment,” says Jamie Merisotis, president of the institute. “Offering postsecondary education to inmates seems less ‘soft on crime’ and more a cost-effective means to reduce recidivism and gain control of the mounting tax burden.”
