Lawsuit: Drug-Based Ban on Financial Aid Hurts Minorities
By Charles Dervarics
For three Midwest college students, a conviction on a minor drug offense may lead to a landmark legal debate with implications for student financial aid policy nationwide.
The American Civil Liberties Union and a student organization have filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of the students to overturn a federal law that revokes Pell Grants and other financial aid to students with drug convictions.
Although the U.S. Congress recently eased some of the restrictions contained in the law, the organizations say the provision is unconstitutional and discriminates against minority and low-income students.
“The only option students have left is to take action in court,” says Kris Krane, executive director of Students for Sensible Drug Policy (SSDP), a Washington, D.C.-based student group that, along with the ACLU, filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Education and its secretary, Margaret Spellings. No court date has been set.
In the suit, Students for Sensible Drug Policy Foundation v. Spellings, the groups claim the denial of financial aid is unconstitutional, since it is in essence a second punishment on top of any legal sanctions imposed by a judge. The suit also contends that the provision violates the equal protection guarantee of the U.S. Constitution by singling out only one group — drug offenders — for unfair treatment.
