The wide-ranging bill, introduced by Senator Jerry Cirino, proposes several substantial changes to Ohio's public universities, including a ban on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, restrictions on faculty strikes, and the introduction of a mandatory civics course. This legislation follows a similar bill introduced by Cirino in 2023, Senate Bill 83, which passed the senate but failed to receive a house vote.
The bill has sparked intense debate within the Ohio academic community, drawing both fervent support and strong opposition. During the Senate's Higher Education Committee meeting, more than 200 people appeared in person to oppose the legislation, with an additional 600 individuals submitting written testimony against it. The hearing stretched for over eight hours, with each speaker limited to approximately three minutes of testimony.
Among the bill's supporters were representatives from organizations such as the National Association of Scholars, the America First Policy Institute, and Do No Harm Action. These groups align with conservative educational policies and have expressed concerns about what they perceive as liberal bias in higher education.
One of the most contentious aspects of the legislation is its approach to "controversial beliefs." The bill would prohibit universities from taking institutional positions on topics including climate policies, electoral politics, foreign policy, DEI programs, immigration policy, marriage, and abortion. Furthermore, these subjects would be banned from appearing in job listings, raising concerns about the potential impact on diversity and inclusion centers at institutions like Ohio University.
Sara Kilpatrick, executive director of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) Ohio Conference, expressed serious concerns about the bill's implications. "By making this bill Senate Bill 1, the senate majority has said that the top priority for them is this anti-higher education bill," she stated, emphasizing the potential negative impact on Ohio's public institutions, which she described as crucial economic drivers for both local communities and the state as a whole.
The legislation would also implement significant changes to faculty evaluation and tenure processes. It mandates the inclusion of a specific question in faculty evaluations: "Does the faculty member create a classroom atmosphere free of political, racial, gender, and religious bias?" Additionally, the bill introduces a "post-tenure review" system that could lead to faculty termination if a professor receives negative evaluations in two out of three consecutive years.
