Activists, led by U.S. Rep. Bobby Rush, D.-Ill., gathered outside the University of Chicago Business School last week to protest the school’s refusal to divest from companies doing business in the African nation of Sudan.
The congressman, representing Illinois’ 1st district, demanded to know why the university has not divested from corporations doing business with Darfur, “even as the Khartoum government is enabling, and by many reports supporting, the Janjaweed in their efforts to … kill millions of innocent African villagers and take their land.
“What kind of example is the university setting by passively remaining neutral at a time when hundreds of thousands are being displaced and killed?” Rush said. “What message is the school sending to the students of its business school about morality and ethics, when the administration and the board of trustees say that they are sorry for the genocide but that the school does not get involved in political decisions?”
University spokesman Larry Arbeiter says the decision not to divest is rooted in a committee report called “Report on the University’s Role in Political and Social Action” of 1967.
“The university exists in order to do research and teach and to be critics of society,” says Arbeiter. “But the university itself is not a critic.”
As the report says, “the instrument of dissent and criticism is the individual faculty member or the individual student. The university … is a community of scholars … it is not a club, it is not a trade association, it is not a lobby.”
The report goes on to state that a collective position would come “at the price of censuring any minority who do not agree with the view adopted.”
