Making Our Voices Heard
When the U.S. Supreme Court announced it would hear the University of Michigan’s affirmative action case and render what will undoubtedly be a landmark ruling on the issue, I honestly thought there would be more of an outcry from civil rights groups lobbying the administration, making the case in support of affirmative action. But it’s been rather quiet, with the exception of the press conference held by several Latino organizations (see stories, pgs. 6 and 18) and the filing of some friend of the court briefs. Can we no longer make the case for affirmative action?
Many argue that we can and should still make the case for affirmative action. And more so, those who support it should not apologize for it. As critical race theorists have argued for the past two decades, affirmative action should not be viewed as a deviation from the norm. The contemporary idea that there was once an unbiased, neutral, level playing field and affirmative action came along and disrupted it is just plain false. Just look closely at our nation’s history, they say. Still, opponents seem to overlook the historical aspect, arguing primarily that affirmative action is “reverse discrimination” and that trying to achieve a diverse student body does not justify race-conscious admissions policies.
