U.S. Minority Culture Course Requirement Debated at UPenn
A recently proposed addition to the core arts and science curriculum at the University of Pennsylvania has sparked debate among its administrators and faculty about what should be taught to freshmen and why.
“We went into curriculum [reform] to reduce the number of requirements,” says Dr. Dennis DeTurck, dean of the college of arts and sciences. “The idea of adding another requirement has made some faculty nervous.”
The debate stems from a proposal to add a second Cross Cultural Analysis Requirement (CCAR), to the undergraduate core curriculum. The initial CCAR focuses on foreign cultures, but some have argued that minority cultures in the United States should be explored as well. According to DeTurck, some faculty members are hesitant to add another requirement to their students’ course loads. Others, he says, feel the proposed course serves political instead of academic interests.
“The conceptual purview of [the United States Cultural Analysis Requirement] as envisioned thus far [is] much too narrow,” economics professor Dr. Francis X. Diebold was quoted as saying in the Daily Pennsylvanian, the university’s student newspaper.
“Penn, like all great universities, should strive to maintain a competitively determined curriculum, reducing politically determined ‘requirement sprawl’ by avoiding [USCAR]-type meddling whenever possible and instead empowering and encouraging students to make their own informed decisions,” he said in the March 26 article.
While it appears that increasing social diversity in the United States and on college campuses has justified the establishment of diversity-focused course requirements, DeTurck says faculty at Penn want requirements to meet a more traditional academic rationale.
