Create a free Diverse: Issues In Higher Education account to continue reading. Already have an account? Enter your email to access the article.

Opinion: Arizona – This is What Apartheid Looks Like

Those who think there’s an immigration crisis in Arizona are correct; however, this is but part of the story. The truth is, a civilizational clash is being played out in the same state in which the state legislature questions the birthplace and legitimacy of President Barack Obama and where Sen. John McCain competes with Senate hopeful J.D. Hayworth to see who is the most anti-immigrant.

 It is also the same state that several years ago denied a holiday for Martin Luther King Jr. and that today permits virtually anyone—on the basis of trumped-up fear—to carry concealed weapons anywhere.

 Welcome to Apartheid Arizona—the land of Sheriff Joe Arpaio, “States Rights” and a desert that has claimed thousands of migrant lives. By way of the same extremist legislature, the battle here is even much larger and more profound. This civilizational clash is being waged daily here via legislative bills involving who belongs, what language can be spoken here, and who and what can be taught in the state’s schools. This is beyond the notion of who is “legal.”

 Whoever said this crisis is proof that the illegal Mexican American War never ended is partially correct because this conflict is even older than that war in which Mexico lost half its territory to the United States. The irony regarding the recently signed Senate Bill (S.B.) 1070—which permits law enforcement to question people about their citizenship, based on “reasonable suspicion”—is that those principally targeted will be those who look the “most Hispanic.”

 “Looking Hispanic” has always been a misnomer; what it really means is those who are dark and short and who look the “most Indigenous.” Truthfully, here in Arpaio Country, that profiling that everyone fears is already here with us. And to dispel illusions, the darkest among us have always been subjected to racial profiling by the “migra” and law enforcement agencies everywhere in the country. This is true whether we’ve been here for a few days or for thousands of years. And to dispel further illusions, this civilizational clash alluded to is national in scope; witness the many hundreds of anti-immigrant bills nationwide since 2006. Only its epicenter is here.

 What is changing with S.B. 1070 is that racial profiling is no longer outside the law; here it now has legal cover. But to be sure, people of conscience will never accept it as law. And just as Arizona Rep. Raul Grijalva is calling for a national and international boycott of Arizona, many are calling on law enforcement to have the moral courage to refuse to recognize S.B. 1070 as a law and simply view it as a proposal until the courts decide on its constitutionality.

 S.B. 1070 brings us to a moral precipice. After World War II, a consensus developed here that it had been wrong to have incarcerated the Japanese in internment camps because such action was morally wrong. Virtually no one had the courage to assert this while it was happening. Law enforcement has that chance today, to refuse to obey S.B. 1070 that is both morally repugnant and outside the U.S. Constitution.

The trusted source for all job seekers
We have an extensive variety of listings for both academic and non-academic positions at postsecondary institutions.
Read More
The trusted source for all job seekers