Scholars and academicians from across the nation found themselves disappointed, saddened but not surprised by the decision of a Kentucky grand jury not to hold all of the Louisville police officers responsible for the killing of Breonna Taylor.
Only one of three police officers involved in the Mar. 13 death of Taylor – a Black woman who worked as an emergency technician – was indicted, with the fired officer, Brett Hankison, charged with three counts of wanton endangerment in the first degree for shooting into neighboring apartments. His bail was set at $15,000. If convicted, Hankison could serve up to five years in prison.
“I will say that it’s disappointing although not surprising,” said Dr. Charles H.F. Davis III, an assistant professor of higher education at the University of Michigan and an expert on campus protests. “We’ve been here many times before, not just in recent memory but historically, with a system that refuses to hold itself accountable.”
The grand jury refused to indict the two other officers involved in Taylor’s death, arguing that they were justified in firing their weapons into her apartment to protect themselves after they allegedly faced gunfire from Taylor’s boyfriend.
Dr. Ricky L. Jones, chair of the University of Louisville’s Pan-African Studies department lamented the grand jury decision, but like Davis, he was not surprised.
“I think what people have to be very clear about — this cannot be reiterated too often and it cannot be overemphasized — that [the officer] was charged with wanton endangerment but he was not charged with wantonly endangering Breonna Taylor,” said Jones. “He was charged with wantonly endangering the people in the apartment next door.
“So what we have here, bottom-line is, Breonna Taylor is dead and nobody is being charged with anything related to her death. I think that speaks for itself. The sadness of that, the ridiculousness of that speaks for itself.”
